Question

Asked by Helen Morgan to Housing, Communities and Local Government on 02 November 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

15. What assessment she has made of the adequacy of funding for local authorities in rural areas.

Answer

Answered by Jim McMahon (Labour (Co-op))

Under this Labour Government, rural authorities in England will see a total increase in core spending power of £958 million from 2024-25 to 2028-29—an increase of 21.1%. As a result of the fair funding reforms, nine in 10 councils will receive funding that more broadly matches their assessed relative need by the end of the multi-year settlement, up from around a third before the reforms took place.

Verdict: AMBER (70/100)

The reply answers the question directly, citing a £958 million (21.1%) rise in rural core spending power to 2028-29 and fair funding reforms that will move nine in ten councils to needs-matched funding, up from about a third. It does not state in so many words whether rural council funding is adequate, so the reader gets the department's evidence and position rather than an explicit verdict. The reply is specific enough that the asker could move on without a follow-up on the figures, though they may want a clearer statement on adequacy itself.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
What is the department's assessment or view of the adequacy of funding for local authorities in rural areas? Addressed Direct The item asks for the department's general view on whether rural council funding is adequate, and the reply gives its position through concrete evidence: a £958 million (21.1%) rise in rural core spending power to 2028-29, and fair funding reforms that will bring nine in 10 councils to need-matched funding, up from about a third. It does not explicitly pronounce the funding 'adequate', but it sets out the department's evidence and stance on rural funding, which is what the item conventionally asks for.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.