Question

Asked by Claire Young to Treasury on 03 November 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

The Treasury is cutting £1 billion from the warm homes fund, including a smaller than planned pot for the boiler upgrade scheme. Combined with tax rises on heat pumps, these cuts risk creating a boom-and-bust cycle for installers and leaving more households exposed to the volatility of the oil and gas market. Can the Chancellor explain how cutting support for clean heating is consistent with the Government’s own mission for a clean energy transition?

Answer

Answered by John Healey (Labour)

Our priority is to give people who are facing a winter of worry with rising energy bills just a bit of relief. That is why the priority is the £100 paid directly into people’s bank accounts, which will go to 20 million households. That is four in five households in England, and it will reach nine out of 10 of the poorest third of families. It is timely, it is targeted and it is fair. It is a choice that this Government have made in the Labour Budget that I delivered last week.
29% vibes

Verdict: RED (5/100)

The question asked how cutting the £1 billion Warm Homes Fund and the boiler upgrade scheme fits with the clean energy transition. The reply did not address this. It described the £100 direct payment to households, which is a different policy, and did not mention clean heating, the two schemes, or how the cuts relate to clean energy goals. The person who asked would most likely need to ask again.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
How the Government's reduction in support for clean heating, including the £1 billion cut to the Warm Homes Fund and the smaller boiler upgrade scheme pot, is consistent with the Government's mission for a clean energy transition Not Addressed Generic MISREADS QUESTION The item asks how cutting the £1 billion Warm Homes Fund and the boiler upgrade scheme pot fits the clean energy transition, but every statement describes the £100 direct bill payment to households, which is a different policy. None mentions clean heating, the Warm Homes Fund, the boiler upgrade scheme, or how the cuts square with the clean energy mission.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.