Question

Asked by Greg Smith to Department for Transport on 27 October 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 23 October 2026 to Question 35233 on Road Works: Utilities, what estimate her Department has made of the number of occasions on which the same section of highway has been excavated by

Answer

Answered by Justin Madders (Labour)

The Department does not hold an estimate of the number of occasions on which the same section of highway has been excavated by different utility companies within a 12‑month period. The Government is committed to minimising disruption from street works and reducing unnecessary repeat excavations. Existing measures, including permit schemes, lane rental schemes and statutory coordination duties, are intended to reduce repeated works. The Department will continue to work with local authorities and industry to improve planning and coordination and maximise opportunities for collaborative working wherever practicable.
25% vibes

Verdict: AMBER (74/100)

The question asked whether the Department has estimated how often the same highway section is repeatedly excavated. The reply states plainly that the Department does not hold such an estimate, which is a complete and direct answer on that point. The reply does narrow its focus to utility company works over a 12-month period, so the asker may still want to ask about the wider question.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
What estimate the Department has made of the number of occasions on which the same section of highway has been excavated Addressed Direct The question asks whether the Department has made an estimate of repeat excavations of the same highway section, and answer statement 1 directly states that the Department does not hold such an estimate, which is a complete factual answer. The reply narrows the scope to utility companies within a 12-month period, but the core answer about the existence of an estimate still responds to the item. Statements 2–4 are general policy context and do not carry the answer.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.