Question

Asked by Sir Ashley Fox to Department for Education on 02 November 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what safeguards her Department has put in place to ensure that input from schools and academy trusts involved in developing the proposed MIS procurement framework is assessed impartially; and whether participan

Answer

Answered by Georgia Gould (Labour)

All participants of the department’s Management Information Systems (MIS) sector working group were required to complete a ‘conflicts of interests’ declaration. No declarations received identified a contractual dispute with an MIS supplier.

Verdict: AMBER (48/100)

The first part of the question is answered directly: the reply describes a mandatory conflicts-of-interest declaration for all sector working group participants and reports that no declarations identified a contractual dispute with an MIS supplier. It does not explain how the input itself is assessed. The second part is only partly addressed, and the statements on it are vague about the specifics the question seems to ask for. Because the question text is incomplete, it is hard to confirm everything that was asked, and a member of the public would likely need to follow up for more detail on the second part.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
What safeguards the Department has put in place to ensure that input from schools and academy trusts involved in developing the proposed MIS procurement framework is assessed impartially. Addressed Direct Statement 1 names a concrete safeguard, a mandatory conflicts-of-interest declaration for all sector working group participants, which is the kind of control the question asks about. Statement 2 supports it by reporting that no declarations identified a contractual dispute with an MIS supplier, though it does not describe how the input itself is assessed.
Whether participants in developing the proposed MIS procurement framework (schools and academy trusts) will be [remainder of the question is truncated in the source text; the specific ask cannot be determined from the text provided]. Partially Addressed Hedged The question text is truncated, so the specific ask cannot be confirmed. The statements touch on participants' interests through the declarations process, but they do not clearly answer whatever the remainder of the item asks.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.