Question

Asked by Noah Law to the Home Department on 02 November 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

I welcome the Home Secretary’s recognition of the crucial work done by overseas care workers. Does she agree not only that this approach is needed not just practically, but that it is the right thing to do in principle to ensure that those who contribute the most in the most under-served professions in our country are rewarded?

Answer

Answered by Shabana Mahmood (Labour)

It was clear from the response to the consultation that the position of care workers was unique. They came at a specific moment post-covid, when there were very real challenges in the care sector, and it is right to reflect that and provide a five-year path to settlement for those who met the terms of their visa.

Verdict: GREEN (82/100)

Both parts of the question were answered directly. The reply explains the reasoning behind the approach, citing the consultation finding that care workers' position was unique and the specific post-Covid pressures on the care sector. It also states that it is right to recognise care workers' contribution and sets out a concrete route: a five-year path to settlement for those who met their visa conditions. A member of the public would likely have enough specific information to move on.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
Does the Home Secretary agree that the approach towards overseas care workers is needed on practical grounds? Addressed Direct The reply grounds the approach in practical conditions: the consultation showed care workers' position was unique, and the policy came at a specific post-Covid moment with real challenges in the care sector. It then names a concrete mechanism, a five-year path to settlement for those who met their visa terms.
Does the Home Secretary agree that it is the right thing in principle to ensure that those who contribute the most in the most under-served professions are rewarded? Addressed Direct The statement that 'it is right to reflect that' directly affirms the in-principle point, and the five-year settlement path for visa-compliant care workers is the concrete form of that reward for workers in an under-served profession.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.