Question

Asked by Dave Robertson to Prime Minister on 28 October 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

Q6. Hon. and right hon. Members will all know that Royal Mail has a serious problem. Part of it is that the parcel companies that Royal Mail competes against use bogus self-employed models for their employees, and too many pay a pittance for an unmanageable workload, where drivers cannot provide a quality service as they race to complete routes. The public purse loses too: Royal Mail pays £650 million in national insurance, while many of its competitor firms pay next to nothing. The Government’s consultation on employment status is a great start. Will the Prime Minister commit to using that review to truly level the playing field and secure the long-term future of Royal Mail, ensuring that my constituents in Lichfield, Burntwood and the villages get the service they deserve?

Answer

Answered by Andy Burnham (Labour (Co-op))

I can absolutely give my hon. Friend that assurance.

Verdict: AMBER (45/100)

The minister gave a clear, direct assurance that the employment status review will be used to level the playing field with self-employed competitors, so the first part of the question was answered in full. The reply did not address the second part, whether the Government will commit to securing Royal Mail's long-term future, which was not covered at all. The asker would have a firm commitment on one point but nothing on the wider question, so they would likely need to ask again about Royal Mail's future.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
Will the Government commit to using its review of employment status to level the playing field between Royal Mail and competing parcel companies that use self-employed delivery models? Addressed Direct The minister gives an unambiguous yes ('I can absolutely give my hon. Friend that assurance') to the question of whether the employment status review will be used to level the playing field with self-employed competitors. The item asks for a commitment rather than a named mechanism, so the affirmative commitment fully answers it.
Will the Government commit to securing the long-term future of Royal Mail? Not Addressed Generic The only answer statement is an assurance tied to the employment status review and competition with parcel firms, and nothing in the reply addresses whether the Government will commit to securing Royal Mail's long-term future.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.