Question

Asked by Katie Lam to Housing, Communities and Local Government on 02 November 2026 — tabled under the Andy Burnham government

Last month, it was reported that money from the Department’s community recovery fund had been funnelled to explicitly partisan groups, and had been used to train activists in how to influence the public to make them pro-migration and against the Conservative party, which was named in training materials. Can the Secretary of State please explain how on earth taxpayer money was spent on this kind of partisan political activity?

Answer

Answered by Angela Rayner (Labour)

I am not aware of the Government spending money on that type of partisan material, but I am happy for the hon. Lady to send it to me. I think she might have written to me about this recently, and I will be happy to respond.

Verdict: RED (14/100) DEFERRED

The question asked how money came to be spent on partisan material. The reply says the department is not aware of any such spending, but it gives no explanation of how the spending happened. Instead, it asks the Member to send the material and promises a later response, so the substantive question is deferred and left unanswered. A member of the public would likely conclude that the question has not yet been answered and would probably need to ask again.

How we got there

Question itemCoverageSpecificityRationale
What is the Secretary of State's explanation of how money from the Department's community recovery fund came to be spent on partisan political activity, including funding of groups and training that referred to the Conservative party. Deferred Hedged The reply disputes awareness of any such spending (seq 1) but gives no explanation of how money came to be spent on partisan activity, and it defers the substantive answer by asking the Member to send the material and promising a later response (seqs 2-4). It engages with the subject of partisan material without committing to any concrete fact, mechanism, or account.

Feedback on this grading

Think this verdict is wrong, or that the question and answer have been mismatched? Let us know.

Submitting this needs Google reCAPTCHA to block spam, which sets cookies from google.com on your device — see our Cookies policy for details. Accept these cookies to show the form.